On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 05:05:27PM +0200, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:On the other hand, I really think gluck is not the machine we should be using to produce all this, it's always overloaded and seems to struggle when it comes to disk access, something we do a lot when producing our images, even using jte.
So, isn't there any other machine in the project that we could use to produce the testing cd/dvd images? Are we really that short on machines?
I seem to remember some vague mentions of spohr being a good candidate, but this is old info and I don't know if it is still correct, especially since it works as bugs.d.o now. Word is that it is pretty idle though.
It's not usually desperately loaded, although occasionally a big spam run can cause issues. It's probably less bad than gluck, although I think I might have concerns about running cdimage on a restricted machine; it's very useful for d-i developers to be able to log in and poke about at what went wrong with a CD build.
Ok, so do we have a better idea of a good machine to use for CD builds? Or should we just keep on using gluck, despite it being rather slow?
/Mattias Wadenstein
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
