On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 09:44:41PM -0400, Brian Mays wrote:
> [SNIP] 
> and it would add the following symlinks to the package:
> 
>       gbrxvt -> crxvt-gb
>       b5rxvt -> crxvt-big5
>       crxvt -> crxvt-big5
> 
> Therefore, I have the following questions:
> 
> 1) There are two ways to distinguish alternate versions of the rxvt
> binary: (1) adding a prefix to the name (e.g., krxvt); (2) adding a
> suffix to the name (e.g., rxvt-xpm).  Anthony's patch uses both of these
> methods.  That is, it adds a suffix to the name and uses a symbolic
> links that add a prefix to the name.  Are both of these methods really
> necessary?  In my opinion, it would be better to drop the b5rxvt and
> gbrxvt symbolic links and distinguish the two binaries with the -gb and
> -big5 suffices.

        I would prefer this method too. I guess users can also emulate this
        by using the shell alias...
> 
> 2) Shouldn't the crxvt symbolic link use Debian's alternatives scheme,
> so that the system administrator can choose whether crxvt runs the Big5
> version or the GB version of rxvt?
> 
> In other words, I recommend that the symbolic links be replaced with the
> following:
> 
>       crxvt -> /etc/alternatives/crxvt -> /usr/X11R6/bin/crxvt-big5

        Yes. I think the policies should be followed. But what about xpm??
        Are you going to have all of the following??
                crxvt-big5-no-xpm
                crxvt-big5-xpm
                crxvt-gb-no-xpm
                crxvt-gb-xpm

        It is a pain to do this, but this seems the only way to satisfy 
everyone...

        Any other comments??
> 
> Thus, there would be no gbrxvt and b5rxvt.  This is what I recommend;
> however, I defer to whatever the members of this mailing list decide.
> 
> Please let me know what you think.
> 
> Thank you,
> Brian
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

-- 
____________________________________________________________________________
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1  ___ _               _____
Department of Communications    / __| |_  __ _ ___  |_  / |_  __ _ _ _  __ _ 
University of New South Wales   \__ \ ' \/ _` / _ \  / /| ' \/ _` | ' \/ _` |
Sydney, Australia               |___/_||_\__,_\___/ /___|_||_\__,_|_||_\__, |
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                                  |___/ 
_____________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to