Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would prefer this method too. I guess users can also emulate > this by using the shell alias...
Yes. Exactly. > Yes. I think the policies should be followed. But what about > xpm?? Are you going to have all of the following?? > crxvt-big5-no-xpm > crxvt-big5-xpm > crxvt-gb-no-xpm > crxvt-gb-xpm > It is a pain to do this, but this seems the only way to satisfy > everyone... Well, I was planning to enable XPM support in crxvr-big5 and crxvt-gb, just as XPM support is enabled in krxvt, crxvt, and grxvt now. Brian
