Hi all,

<Debian developer hat>

S3 AMIs sounds like a good idea to me, but I haven’t had time yet to work on 
this. I think that while ec2debian-build-ami may not have a “--s3” option right 
now, we (anyone here) should perhaps contribute patches to make it so and then 
offer S3 backed and EBS backed.

We also have yet to provide HVM based AMIs (take a look at the larger instance 
types); again patches welcomed I’m sure, and should be easily do-able. I would 
then see us offering 4 “base Debian” AMIs per release:


·         PVM EBS

·         PVM S3

·         HVM EBS

·         HVM S3


In other news, I have updated the wiki page at 
http://wiki.debian.org/Cloud/AmazonEC2Image/Squeeze with the information about 
the new 6.0.7 AMIs generated on Sunday morning (Jetlag in Seattle), and with no 
ill effects reported, I pushed this to the AWS Marketplace team on Tuesday, and 
am awaiting this to be visible in the Marketplace catalogue; I’ll contribute 
the Marketplace AMI IDs to the documentation when I see them.

Perhaps we should offer the CloudFormation Template on this documentation 
showing both the Debian-Account AMIs, and the Marketplace ones and let the user 
select (via the mapping function)  which they want to use (note: up to now, AWS 
Marketplace is not available in ap-southeast-2/Sydney, so the 
Debian-AMI-account AMI is the only choice here).


…. but if anyone gets to contribute patches for S3 based AMIs before me, let me 
know! :)

  James


From: Kostis Fardelas [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, 28 February 2013 3:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Re: RE: Instance-store Amazon AMI

Hello Chris,

well yes, I have seen them already, but the security of user-contributed AMIs" 
warning plus the
"This is a RightScale Open Source MultiCloud Image supported by the community 
only and is an alpha release not recommended for production systems." note 
regarding Rightscale AMIs specifically make people anxious.

So I would normally expect from Debian to publish officially S3 backed AMIs for 
squeeze at least, and for wheezy maybe it would be enough to publish S3 backed 
AMIs like the way EBS backed wheezy AMIs have been published so far (as a 
cooperation between Debian, James Bromberger and Anders Ingemann as I can 
understand so far).

Reply via email to