On Nov 12, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > changes, isn't a point of argumentation (see my previous mail). All of > the packages must be taken from stable, unchanged, and if some are taken > from backports, this must be explicit, and the image shouldn't be called > "stable Debian". Official, yes, but not stable (maybe stable + some > backports would be ok...). While this is techically true, I do not think that it would also be helpful in any way.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
