On 11/12/2015 04:06 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 12, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > >> changes, isn't a point of argumentation (see my previous mail). All of >> the packages must be taken from stable, unchanged, and if some are taken >> from backports, this must be explicit, and the image shouldn't be called >> "stable Debian". Official, yes, but not stable (maybe stable + some >> backports would be ok...). > While this is techically true, I do not think that it would also be > helpful in any way.
Helpful for who? I don't think it's helpful for the project to let $cloud-provider to do as his pleased with our Debian trademark, and call whatever as "Debian stable", just because it makes sense for the marketing department. We have long established rules, I don't see why they wouldn't apply for the "official Debian" cloud images. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)