-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 06:33:35PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi David,
> David Prévot wrote:
> > Le 22/09/2016 à 01:08, Sam Hartman a écrit :
> > >>>>>> "Xavier" == Xavier Bestel <xavier.bes...@free.fr> writes:
> > > Xavier> Le mardi 20 septembre 2016 à 19:38 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff
> > > >> Nack. It's not an important package if we can't support it
> > > >> properly. Let's not repeat the owncloud disaster.
> > >
> > > Xavier> OK, I understand the "official" debian point of view.
> > >
> > > I don't think this is an official Debian POV, simply the opinion of some
> > > Debian contributors...
> > Moritz is an active and well known member of the security team.
> That still doesn't make his opinion "official". I don't think that
> something like an "official Debian opinion" exists at all.
However there is are "official" Debian opionions that are shared widely.
Example given: Let's not repeat the .* disaster.
> > The current ownCloud upstream maintainers reached back to us a few
> > months ago and are willing to help (or at least not be as obnoxious as
> > the ones who drove the package away from Debian, and are now gone in the
> > nextcloud fork team).
> Do I read that right, the chances for nextCloud in Debian are rather
> low while the chances to get ownCloud back in Debian raised due to the
> obnoxious upstream developers left together with nextCloud fork and
> the remaining developers are more friendly towards distributions?
Yes, that is what I did also read in it.
Leven en laten leven
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----