Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Release-critical bugs, and #97671"):
> I therefore hereby propose the following resolution of the Technical
> Committee:(Full resolution below.) No-one has commented to say they object to us punting on this one, so I hereby call for a vote on the resolution I proposed on Monday. If anyone votes against, or proposes an amendment, I'll probably withdraw the resolution so we can talk about it. Ian. -8<- We note that * This dispute contains both technical and process (ie political) elements; however, it has not been possible to identify a clear technical dispute which as at the heart of the problem. * The heart of the problem seems to be a disagreement over the proper use of various tagging features of the bug tracking system. This is a process matter. * We do not feel that this decision is within our normal remit; the constitution suggests that the project leader and delegates would be responsible. * The bug system administrators would seem to be the most relevant delegates. * We are not sufficiently united in our opinions that we feel that the Committee should issue any formal advice or opinion. * Should a disputed technical question be raised, we would be happy to answer it. We therefore recommend that * The bug system administrators and/or the project leader or some other delegates appointed by the project leader decide on the proper use of the bug system features. -- Ian Jackson, at home. Local/personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
