debian-ctte  

Messages by Thread

• • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Bastian Blank
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Ansgar
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Adam Borowski
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Philip Hands
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Niko Tyni
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Adam Borowski
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Marco d'Itri
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Elana Hashman
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Margarita Manterola
  • Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? David Bremner
  • Bug#978636: marked as done (move to merged-usr-only?) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#981582: release-notes: bullseye to be the last release to support non-merged /usr layout Andrei POPESCU
• Processed: retitle 975075 to tech-ctte: Should NetworkManager support elogind? Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processed: retitle 975075 to Should NetworkManager support elogind? Debian Bug Tracking System
• Additional TC meeting before next one Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Additional TC meeting before next one Margarita Manterola
• Next Meeting - December 16th at 18:00 UTC (in 1.5 hours) Margarita Manterola
• Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Niels Thykier
  • Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Sean Whitton
  • Bug#976462: Bug#631985: Compress debug Sean Whitton
  • Bug#976462: Bug#631985: Compress debug Josh Triplett
  • Bug#976462: Bug#631985: Compress debug Sean Whitton
  • Bug#976462: Bug#631985: Compress debug Sam Hartman
  • Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Elana Hashman
  • Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Florian Weimer
  • Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Jakub Wilk
  • Re: Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Josh Triplett
  • Re: Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Sean Whitton
  • Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Elana Hashman
  • Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Matthias Klose
  • Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Sean Whitton
  • Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Sean Whitton
  • Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Matthias Klose
  • Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Sam Hartman
  • Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Matthias Klose
  • Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Sam Hartman
  • Bug#976462: debian bug 976462 Mark Wielaard
  • Bug#976462: debian bug 976462 Sean Whitton
  • Bug#976462: debian bug 976462 Mark Wielaard
  • Bug#976462: marked as done (tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not?) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation Stephan Lachnit
  • Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation Yangfl
  • Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation Sean Whitton
  • Processed: Re: Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation Andreas Metzler
  • Bug#975381: marked as done (Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Today's meeting Sean Whitton
• Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
  • Processed: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Felix Lechner
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Philipp Kern
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Philip Hands
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Mark Hindley
  • Re: Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? lorenzo
  • Re: Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Philip Hands
  • Re: Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? lorenzo
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Philip Hands
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Mark Hindley
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Vincent Bernat
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Vincent Bernat
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Josh Triplett
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Ian Jackson
  • Bug#975075: Josh Triplett
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Felix Lechner
  • Bug#975075: analogies Simon McVittie
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Josh Triplett
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Josh Triplett
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Tianon Gravi
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Elana Hashman
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Elana Hashman
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Mark Hindley
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Mark Hindley
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Josh Triplett
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Mark Hindley
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sam Hartman
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sam Hartman
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sam Hartman
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? gregor herrmann
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Russ Allbery
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Bdale Garbee
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sam Hartman
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Vincent Bernat
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Russ Allbery
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sam Hartman
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Ansgar
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Ian Jackson
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Simon McVittie
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Mark Hindley
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Matthew Vernon
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Sean Whitton
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Matthew Vernon
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Russ Allbery
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Sam Hartman
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Felix Lechner
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Sandro Tosi
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Felix Lechner
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Sam Hartman
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Andreas Henriksson
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Matthew Vernon
  • Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Jan Korbel
  • Bug#975075: Closing as this has been resolved without the TC needing to intervene Margarita Manterola
  • Bug#975075: marked as done (tech-ctte: Should NetworkManager support elogind?) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Next Meeting - October 21st at 18:00 UTC (tomorrow) Margarita Manterola
• Bug#947847: Fwd: Bug#946456: systemd: Provide systemd-sysusers as an independent package Michael Biebl
  • Bug#947847: Fwd: Bug#946456: systemd: Provide systemd-sysusers as an independent package David Bremner
  • Bug#947847: Fwd: Bug#946456: systemd: Provide systemd-sysusers as an independent package Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#947847: Fwd: Bug#946456: systemd: Provide systemd-sysusers as an independent package Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#947847: Fwd: Bug#946456: systemd: Provide systemd-sysusers as an independent package Sean Whitton
• Processed: unarchiving 947847 Debian Bug Tracking System
• Review/testing requested for gnome-team/glib!9: cleaning up old GLib from /lib/<triplet> Simon McVittie
• Bug#971515: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Dmitry Smirnov
  • Processed: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#971515: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Sean Whitton
  • Bug#971515: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Dmitry Smirnov
  • Re: Bug#971515: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Felix Lechner
  • Bug#971515: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Dmitry Smirnov
  • Re: Bug#971515: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Felix Lechner
  • Bug#971515: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Dmitry Smirnov
  • Re: Bug#971515: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Sean Whitton
  • Bug#971515: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Sean Whitton
  • Bug#971515: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Dmitry Smirnov
  • Bug#971515: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Shengjing Zhu
  • Bug#971515: kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) Dmitry Smirnov
  • Bug#971515: Request for security team input on kubernetes TC bug Sean Whitton
  • Bug#971515: Request for security team input on kubernetes TC bug Dmitry Smirnov
  • Bug#971515: Request for security team input on kubernetes TC bug Moritz Mühlenhoff
  • Bug#971515: Request for security team input on kubernetes TC bug Dmitry Smirnov
  • Bug#971515: Request for security team input on kubernetes TC bug Moritz Mühlenhoff
  • Bug#971515: Request for security team input on kubernetes TC bug Florian Weimer
  • Bug#971515: Request for security team input on kubernetes TC bug Moritz Mühlenhoff
  • Bug#971515: Request for security team input on kubernetes TC bug Florian Weimer
  • Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Sean Whitton
  • Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Russ Allbery
  • Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Ian Jackson
  • Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Shengjing Zhu
  • Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Josh Triplett
  • Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Jonathan Carter
  • Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Philip Hands
  • Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#971515: Janos LENART
  • Bug#971515: marked as done (kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries)) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#971515: marked as done (kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries)) Dmitry Smirnov
  • Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Dmitry Smirnov
  • Bug#971515: CTTE decision on "kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries)" Shengjing Zhu
  • Bug#971515: CTTE decision on "kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries)" Dmitry Smirnov
• Bug#970717: kubernetes: abuse of "embedded code copies" | hundreds of vendored libraries Dmitry Smirnov
• Next Meeting - September 16th at 18:00 UTC (in about 1.5 hours) Margarita Manterola
• Pad from the DebConf20 session Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: Pad from the DebConf20 session David Bremner
• Bits from the Technical Committee Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Bits from the Technical Committee Iustin Pop
  • Re: Bits from the Technical Committee Paul Wise
  • Re: Bits from the Technical Committee Christoph Berg
  • Re: Bits from the Technical Committee Donald Norwood
• slides for TC bof. David Bremner
• Collating responses to our request for input Sean Whitton
• Next Meeting - August 19th at 18:00 UTC (in about 2 hours) Margarita Manterola
• Proposal: Make it Easier to Refine TC Process Sam Hartman
  • Re: Proposal: Make it Easier to Refine TC Process David Bremner
  • Re: Proposal: Make it Easier to Refine TC Process Jonathan Carter
  • Re: Proposal: Make it Easier to Refine TC Process Sam Hartman
• Problem: Ineffective at Choosing a Maintainer Sam Hartman
• Re: CTTE requesting questions for DebConf20 BoF Charles Plessy

• Earlier messages
• Later messages