* Clint Adams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070625 21:43]: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 05:32:53PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > If anyone other than Sven comes up with a good use for a libstdc++ > > udeb, despite the problems described by others here, then I would like > > people to give it all due consideration. If the situation changes I'm > > sure that the d-i team and if necessary the committee are capable of > > changing their minds. > > Could someone assert why "dependency of a potential partimage udeb" is > not a "good use"?
What is the use case? Installer? - the installer people didn't want it. (Apart from the word "potential") Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
