[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Langasek) writes: > FWIW, I think it could have been made clearer that choice 2 refers to not > overruling the maintainer's decision, rather than instructing the maintainer > not to create the udeb package.
Yes, good point. I'll try to pick better text for votes in the future. > (but then, if they were sorted I have no reason to think the > maintainer would have to be overruled). Agreed. What was completely lacking in this case was a compelling use case for the requested feature addition. As I've stated elsewhere, I think there is a "burden of proof" on anyone requesting a new feature addition like this to provide such a use case, preferably in the form of working code everyone involved can evaluate... Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
