On Sun, 02 Dec 2012, Russ Allbery wrote: > Don Armstrong <[email protected]> writes: > > This is the current text of the options for #688772. I'd like to vote on > > this before the 9th if at all possible. If anyone has any comments, > > changes, or would like to propose different options, please do so now. > > After considering this and following the discussion, I'm not willing > to vote for either A or B, and would end up voting further > discussion. I'd like to add an option C, along the lines of:
[...] Ok, so this option C would involve not overriding the maintainer, coupled with requesting documentation in the release notes, and would also supplant 5 and 6 in the A and B versions. I've gone ahead and updated the current don_draft.txt with this text as written with the other options. > In other words, my *preferred* option is B with the fix to the > network-manager package, but B as phrased has consequences for not > getting that fix done in time that I'm not comfortable with. I believe that the fixes outlined in option B are going to get implemented regardless of how the CTTE rules; the primary goal of B is to make the gnome dependency on NM conditional on those fixes being implemented. [And if that's not clear from the text of B, that's something that I would like to resolve.] Don Armstrong -- He was wrong. Nature abhors dimensional abnormalities, and seals them neatly away so that they don't upset people. Nature, in fact, abhors a lot of things, including vacuums, ships called the Marie Celeste, and the chuck keys for electric drills. -- Terry Pratchet _Pyramids_ p166 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
