Don Armstrong <[email protected]> writes: > Ok, so this option C would involve not overriding the maintainer, > coupled with requesting documentation in the release notes, and would > also supplant 5 and 6 in the A and B versions.
Ah, yes, indeed, it would. > I've gone ahead and updated the current don_draft.txt with this text > as written with the other options. Thanks! > I believe that the fixes outlined in option B are going to get > implemented regardless of how the CTTE rules; the primary goal of B is > to make the gnome dependency on NM conditional on those fixes being > implemented. [And if that's not clear from the text of B, that's > something that I would like to resolve.] If that does happen, of course, I'm happy to support B. I don't know how much progress has already been made on that. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
