Steve Langasek writes ("Bug#727708: systemd-shim uploaded to NEW"):
> So I repeat here my request that the systemd maintainers make a suitable
> split of the systemd binary package, so that systemd-shim will be
> coinstallable with the systemd-provided implementations of the other dbus
> services.Is there a summary of the systemd maintainers' response to this request ? I glanced #726763 and #729576 but they were very long and if the answer is in there I probably wouldn't have found it. > The only alternative I see is for systemd-shim to declare a > Replaces: against systemd without a Conflicts, This would be quite wrong; Replaces is not supposed to be used like that (but you apparently know that). How do the systemd maintainers think this problem should be solved ? Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
