On Mon, 30 Dec 2013, Ian Jackson wrote: > > The only alternative I see is for systemd-shim to declare a > > Replaces: against systemd without a Conflicts, > > This would be quite wrong; Replaces is not supposed to be used like > that (but you apparently know that). > > How do the systemd maintainers think this problem should be solved ?
I don't know the specifics of systemd-shim, but dpkg-divert is the usual answer when you need/want to replace something without the consent of the other side. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131230184258.gc24...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com
