Sébastien Villemot writes ("Bug#727708: TC resolution revised draft"):
> P1: DT > UT > DL > UL
> P2: DL > UL > DT > UT
> P3: UT > UL > DL > DT
> P4: UT > UL > DL > DTThis is a nice example which actually demonstrates why these questions need to be voted on in a single ballot. If one votes on T-vs-L before U-vs-D, P3 and P4 don't know how to vote on T-vs-L until they know how the vote on U-vs-D will turn out. And of course the order would have to be fixed, and not depend on assumptions about the preferences of the voters; so it's not an answer to say "then we'll do U-vs-D first". Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
