Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Bug#727708: init system coupling etc."):
> I must admit that I only followed this part of the discussion from a
> distance.Fair enough. > On 12/02/14 at 14:08 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > [loose coupling] > > > > Software outside of an init system's implementation may not require > > a specific init system to be pid 1, although degraded operation is > > tolerable. > > This is super vague. What does being "outside of an init system's > implementation" mean? What does "degraded operation" mean? Yes. I agree that it's vague. I'm open to better and clearer suggestions. When I wrote this I was hoping that the policy process would be able to refine the details but perhaps that's overoptimistic. I'm also open to suggestions that we should extend the discussion period to facilitate improvements to this and other options. How long do people think we need ? (I'll deal with the rest of your mail later.) Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
