Uwe Storbeck <[email protected]> writes: > On Feb 12, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Packages should normally support the default Linux init system. > [..] >> Package maintainers are strongly encouraged to merge any contributions >> for support of init systems other than the Linux default, and to add >> that support themselves if they're willing and capable of doing so. > Assumed a package has (only) start scripts for sysvinit. This satisfies > "Packages should normally support the default Linux init system" (using > sysvinit compatibility mode). Someone provides patches to add native > support for upstart and systemd, maybe to use advanced features like > socket activation. Following the above proposal the package maintainer > is encouraged to apply the patch for upstart (as an init system "other > than the Linux default"), but not the patch for systemd. > Wouldn't it be better to change that to something like "for support of > any init system"? Yes, that's much better. Thanks! -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
