]] Cameron Norman Please trim bits you're not replying to.
> El mar, 21 de oct 2014 a las 10:19 , Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> > escribió: > > ]] Russ Allbery > >> I would be particularly interested in your take on the analysis > >> that Steve Langasek posted to the debian-devel thread on why > >> listing systemd-shim as the first alternative dependency for > >> libpam-systemd makes sense and should not cause any negative > >> effects for systemd users. > > > > In a steady state, this would probably be ok. However, we've so far > > seen two instances of -shim breaking for systemd users > > (https://bugs.debian.org/746242 and https://bugs.debian.org/765101), > > by shipping outdated security policies. We are worried that this > > will happen again on future updates of systemd. > > Josh Triplett proposed a long term solution to the problem you point > out here that will work across systemd upgrades. What are your > thoughts on that solution? > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765101#38 That seems like a fine approach to me. I thought it already depended on systemd, though. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/m2h9ywhakn....@rahvafeir.err.no