Ian Jackson <[email protected]> writes: > Russ Allbery writes:
>> Thanks, Tollef! Okay, so there does appear to be a conflict here. It >> sounds like your primary technical concern, not addressed by Martin's >> mail, is that getting the dependencies right to install systemd on >> initial install but not upgrade to it are tricky and have a lot of >> corner cases, and you feel like it's late in the release process to >> make that change. > That's not the impression I got from Tollef's mail. I thought his > concern was mostly bugs in systemd-shim. Surely the question of > the default can be addressed easily enough in the installer - it can > just be told, explicitly, to install systemd. It would be better to let Tollef speak for himself, so re-adding the systemd mailing list, but I believe his message was addressing two different issues: whether to switch init systems on upgrade, and the dependencies on libpam-systemd (since I explicitly asked about that). The issue of bugs in systemd-shim came up in the latter context, and I replied to that in that context. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
