On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:20:37PM +0000, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Wouter Verhelst said: > > > > I'd agree that there are way better ones out there. But I'd also say > > that it doesn't really matter which is best, and that this type of > > behaviour is quite childish. As long as qmail is free, packaged > > properly, and integrates well with the rest of Debian, I don't see why > > anyone should oppose its packaging. > > > > Whether or not it's a good MTA, the fact is that it's a *popular* MTA. > > That alone should be a good reason to package it. > > I don't agree with this, actually. qmail is so poorly designed it can't > stay running without a supervisor, and in it's default state is a > giant producer of backscatter.
I said "packaged properly, and integrates well with the rest of Debian". This is not -devel, so I'll leave the rest of my argument as an exercise to the reader. -- <Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
