On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 03:55:39PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 11:20:45AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are *way* better MTAs [than qmail] out > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there that dont need tons of patches applied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just to fulfill basic requirements for a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MTA. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, there are not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, there are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, there are not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, there are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, there are not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, there are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, there are not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, there are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, there are not. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, there are. > > > > > > > > > > > No, there are not. > > > > > > > > Yes, there are. > > > > > > No, there are not. > > > > Yes, there are. > > > > Next? ;-) > > I'd agree that there are way better ones out there. But I'd also say > that it doesn't really matter which is best, and that this type of > behaviour is quite childish. As long as qmail is free, packaged > properly, and integrates well with the rest of Debian, I don't see why > anyone should oppose its packaging. > > Whether or not it's a good MTA, the fact is that it's a *popular* MTA. > That alone should be a good reason to package it.
When did qmail become free? And isn't it already packaged in non-free where it belongs? -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
