That's obviously a useless use of cat, as licensing orthogonally on any concept of superior species would be better replaced by a cut of tee.
Le 8 mars 2017 22:20:15 GMT+01:00, Adam Borowski <[email protected]> a écrit : >Hrm, looks like I have a problem with a ftpmaster being in denial. > ># Cat Supremacy License, version √-1 ># ># Everyone who recognizes the superiority of the species Felis catus >over ># mere Homo sapiens is hereby gladly granted the right to use, modify, ># distribute, sell, borrow, give, steal, pee on, print out and use as a ># kindle, deface, scribble on, give less, more or same respect as >$PRESIDENT ># of $YOUR_COUNTRY gives to the Constitution, etc, and so on, this >software; ># with or without modifications, in either a preferred or unpreferred >form ># for modification, with or without a fee of any kind. ># ># Those who have yet to mend the error of their ways are also given all >of ># the above rights, albeit grudgingly. > >Obviously, the two above sets are not complementary: for example, you >may >still be in an unrelated error while admitting the superiority of the >Master >Species. An example might be trying to give "Kitty" brand food by >Mispol SA >to your master -- it has been declared as inedible by a local expert in >these matters. > >On the other hand, it is clear that all humans belong to at least one >of >these sets, at least at present and in foreseable future. > >Thus, I'm trying to find out what's wrong. If someone gene-splices >humans >with cats to create something even more glorious, the result won't be a >human anymore -- if you put little enough of cat to remain a Homo >Sapiens, >you won't be superior or equal. > >The only scenario I managed to think of is, if the Earth is to be >destroyed >and a group of humans manage to escape while not having their >priorities >straight (ie, not rescuing a single pair of cats), then obviously an >existant species, no matter how bad, will be superior to one that's not >there. > > >On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 08:00:09PM +0000, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: >> >> Hi Adam, >> >> I don't think that cats are superior and given the behaviour of my >cats >> I know that this is not erroneous. Why may I not print out your >software? > >The worst part of denial about being in error is that you believe you >don't >need to take any steps to rectify it. > >As Wikipedia says: > ># Denial of denial ># ># This can be a difficult concept for many people to identify with in ># themselves, but is a major barrier to changing hurtful behaviors. >Denial ># of denial involves thoughts, actions and behaviors which bolster ># confidence that nothing needs to be changed in one's personal >behavior. ># This form of denial typically overlaps with all of the other forms of ># denial, but involves more self-delusion. > >> >> === >> >> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why >> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address >our >> concerns. > >Not sure how to fix this. I can't fix the ftpmaster, thus replacing >the >license is probably easiest. The default choice, GPL, doesn't fit here >as the program is too easy to recreate, thus it'd result merely in >those >with different beliefs about licensing to waste a bit of time. And as >for >non-copyleft licenses, there's way too many of them to rationally >choose. > >Alas, I have a problem: >* I can't seem to find a single die >* I have no ChaosKey or similar true random generator >* my CPU has no rdrand so I can't even let Intel rig my choice > > >Thus, could anyone help, and pick a license that would get accepted? >Either >a pull request at https://github.com/kilobyte/braillegraph or a mail >would >be swell. > >-- >⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Meow! >⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ >⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Collisions shmolisions, let's see them find a collision or >second >⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ preimage for double rot13! -- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
