I wish you licence that text under cat licence, or, at option, above. While nested cat is unclear as licenced or not.
I ensure my cat is not reproductible, with any warranty based on Free Speech. Having a binary form which need some debugging (including severe bits), and an insurance I wouldn't pay in order to chare it. Le 9 mars 2017 22:36:27 GMT+01:00, Adam Borowski <[email protected]> a écrit : >On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:14:52PM -0600, Robin Tarsiger wrote: >> On 2017-03-08, Adam Borowski wrote: >> > # Everyone who recognizes the superiority of the species Felis >catus over >> > # mere Homo sapiens >> [...] >> > # Those who have yet to mend the error of their ways >> [...] >> > On the other hand, it is clear that all humans belong to at least >one of >> > these sets, at least at present and in foreseable future. >> >> I cannot speak for "all humans", but as a robin, I hereby claim my >right >> to not be in either of these sets. After all, cats and humans are >_both_ >> obviously inferior to glorious birds! Cheep! > >The license grant is to "Everyone who recognizes ..." and to "Those who >have >yet to mend the error of their ways". It doesn't say a word about a >relationship between robins and humans, robins and cats, nor any other >pair >of species other than specifically named "Felis catus" vs "Homo >sapiens". > >Neither are robins, sentient AIs, the Elder Gods or any other possible >recipient excluded from the license grant -- it talks merely about >their >opinion about cats vs humans, which might be either: >* cats>humans >* wrong > > > >Also, while your delusion about superiority of _robins_ is irrelevant >to >freeness of the license, I'd like to present a rebuttal. > >First, one example cat, one who's currently occupying my bed, has >confirmed >kills (as in, delivered home) of at least tits, sparrows, pigeons and >two >bigass jackdaws[1]. Robins don't live inside a town but I don't see >how >they differ from the above list enough to avoid being turned into a >meal. > >Second, Enrico mentioned dinosaurs. While the above cat deals with >dinosaurs I listed just fine, let's consider what an ordinary person >would >understand by this word: the big extinct type. Let's assume they're >revived, "Jurassic Park" style. And here comes the real secret of cat >superiority: they delegate. Why would they fight a dangerous opponent >themselves when they suborned an inferior species (humans) who are >extremely >good at hunting big prey (and wannabe predators)? That T-Rex would >serve >well as contents of a can; they're presumed to taste like chicken. > > >[1]. How he managed to get the jackdaws over a windowsill that's >human-chest-high when he was barely able to drag them over flat ground >is >beyond me -- but then, I'm a mere human, I'm not privy to cat ways. >-- >⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Meow! >⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ >⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Collisions shmolisions, let's see them find a collision or >second >⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ preimage for double rot13! -- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
