-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 08:57:51AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Holger Levsen wrote: >> What voting method do you have in mind? Who can vote? Where will the >> vote be announced? > > Well, we have this condorcet voting mechanism in Debian - I see no > reason to derive from this. IMHO this list + the lists of each > existing project seems apropriate. IMHO readers of the list are > interested voters (yes, there is an option that you buy a gang of > people who subscribe to the list and promote your favourite name - but > I guess this will not really happen). Votting mails should be signed > by a valid key.
So in your opinion participants in the vote is readers of this and related lists that is part of the Debian ring of trust? > Please understand me right: I would *really* like to avoid the effort > of voting but do you see any other chance to find a consensus. You probably meant "decision" or "solution" as final word above. Consensus and democratic voting is *different* methods to reach a decision. (and until you brought up the issue of voting I actually believed that you wanted to avoid that and instead take the needed time to reach consensus by open debate instead) - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjYz7MACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgCuACfeaInxIjsEBRXyZSpfQvy5hLu x6QAn0ee/+5I1mW8IbQZ/JNxmYuM+nr3 =in5J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
