On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:38:02PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > OK, so I hope doodle is a good tool to reach this. I started a poll at > > http://doodle.ch/ggey86bvqnmcnuyb
thank you. filled it out... > by the trying to choose the most promising proposals in the sequence > they were issued and picked some from the Wiki page [1] that sounded > promissing. I did not add any name suggestion that contains the term > "Distribution" because I think that this is the most problematic part > of CDD. If you do not agree just write me an e-mail which name you > want to see added. Please also write me an e-mail if you think I > forgot a promissing suggestion (and sorry in advance if I missed > your favourite one). well, i really think "Integrated Debian Distribution" is worth considering. or "Integrated Debian Subdistribution". though i see some weakness in the term "Distribution", i don't see it as the primary problem for CDD, rather the "Custom" was the primary issue. maybe not... and i prefer "Integrated Debian Projects" over "Debian Integrated Projects". something about it just makes more sense to me. clearly, "none of the above" is something worth mentioning, or simply a category called "Debian", as several people have mentioned it thus far. it is an shame that flavour is also spelled flavor, as i think Debian Integrated Flavor or Integrated Debian Flavour ... really hits home with the Integrated clearly defining that it's part of Debian, and Flavour making it a nice food related analogy. Debian Integrated Focus ? (or my usual Integrated first preference..) gah. i said i didn't want to get too deeply into this... i've already got a half-dozen more ideas. live well, vagrant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
