Well, you asked for comments on the description. So here goes, On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 08:57:51AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have started three efforts to find a new name: > > 1. http://wiki.debian.org/CDDNamingProposals > --> gathered a lot of suggestions - but we do not have to INcrease > the number, we have to DEcrease the number to 1 Reading at "Thingy1" there, it seems to me that the definition bundles together two things: 1. The produced distribution (The thing that is now called CDD) 2. The team that produces it. Could you please try to explain to me what is the point in such an effort? What does it include that I can't easily implement in a simple extra preseed script for an installation media? Furthermore, the more independent infrastructure this team has, the closer it is to "Thingy2". A distribution that includes Stable and a number of packages backported from Testing is clearly a Thingy2. In short, I suspect that the bluring between the original and the percieved meaning of CDD is also because when you have a team that has its own goals and time tables, and its own infrastructure, it tends not to be a strict subset of Debian. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
