On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > >> My question is, is `required=4.0' justified? How much score have the > >> most wired bug report with garbage, as bug info? A wild guess is > >> -0.0 .. 2.0, but 4.0? > > > > The question is at which point the false positives and false negatives > > are appropriate. The lower the score goes, the more false positives we > > have, which are more insidious and difficult to deal with than false > > negatives. > > Yes, it seems like very message body independent, but smtp/gmane magic > dependent... > > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO, > > IMPRONONCABLE_1,MDO_DATING2,SARE_MLB_Stock6,SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3, > > UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.4 > [] > > Original-Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by epsilon.donarmstrong.com > > (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l69KC4lS027425 for > > [email protected]; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:12:04 -0700 > > | X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=LDOSUBSCRIBER, > SARE_MLB_Stock6, > [] > | Original-Received: from flower.upol.cz ([158.194.64.22]) by > main.gmane.or >
I'm not sure what you intend to show by this. Don Armstrong -- My spelling ability, or rather the lack thereof, is one of the wonders of the modern world. http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
