On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > >> I see no such message go to bts, why they are appear in mailing > >> lists. > >> > >> Is cleaning done manually, or bts itself have another filter? > > > > The cleaning is done manually (often very quickly) primarily by Blars. > > b.d.o do have different filters than lists.debian.org, but in general > > they catch the same sort of stuff. > > I meant mailing list where messages from bts are forwarded. > > Resent-From: Thornton B.Roddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist... > Resent-Cc: Debbugs developers <debian-debbugs... > Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:06:02 +0000 > > So, in such cases both filters fail or bts have another path here?
I'm still not understanding what you're asking; if you mean do the cases of spam reaching the lists after traversing the BTS indicate a failure of both filters to correctly identify spam, the answer is yes. > I'm also asking this because of thoughts, i've posted in debian-devel. > Mainly adding package name after bug# and bug title (in separate header) > to forwarded reports from bts to mailing lists. There's little point of including the title of the bug, because that's extreemly plastic. However, we do include the package name in the X-Debbugs-*; headers. Don Armstrong -- There are two types of people in this world, good and bad. The good sleep better, but the bad seem to enjoy the waking hours much more. -- Woody Allen http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
