On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 05:26:27PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > > Ok, so why did this come up at all in the discussion of the kernel > package bloat? It seems to me that providing optimized kernels is a
Because someone asked why the kernel-headers necessary. Their presence allows both our module maintainers and other maintainers to compile modules easily. It doesn't mean that they will. But it certainly makes it a lot more likely. > after seeing so many kernel versions. Your binary module argument > would support encouraging the use of a uniform kernel build. I don't > care about this particular argument or its consequences, but I would > think that you would, with your sympathies to "binary-only" kernel > modules. You seem to be confusing the kernel-header discussion with the kernel-image discussion. Please go back and reread the thread. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt