debian-devel  

Messages by Thread

• Bug#1100127: ITP: python-enamlx -- Additional Qt Widgets for Enaml Alexander Sulfrian
• Bug#1100131: ITP: golang-github-eggsampler-acme -- Go client library implementation for ACME v2 (RFC8555) Luca Soler
• Bug#1100128: ITP: golang-github-letsencrypt-borp -- Boulder's version of go-gorp/gorp Luca Soler
• Bug#1100121: ITP: golang-github-poy-onpar -- Parallel testing framework for Go Luca Soler
• Bug#1100112: ITP: golang-github-ashcrow-osrelease -- Go library/binary for parsing osrelease Thomas Goirand
• Bug#1100106: ITP: golang-go4-netipx -- extra stuff from inet.af/netaddr that didn't make it into Go's net/netip Thomas Goirand
• Bug#1100099: ITP: python-elastcsearch8 -- Python client for Elasticsearch8 Karsten Schöke
• Bug#1100098: ITP: golang-github-yalue-merged-fs -- compose Multiple Go Filesystems Thomas Goirand
• General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Marc Haber
  • General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Simon Richter
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Marc Haber
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Dirk Lehmann
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Marc Haber
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Maytham Alsudany
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Marc Haber
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Marc Haber
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Marc Haber
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Marc Haber
  • Documentation for Package Maintainers regarding Translations (was: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do) Marc Haber
  • Re: Documentation for Package Maintainers regarding Translations (was: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do) Helge Kreutzmann
  • Re: Documentation for Package Maintainers regarding Translations (was: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do) Marc Haber
  • Re: Documentation for Package Maintainers regarding Translations (was: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do) Helge Kreutzmann
  • Re: Documentation for Package Maintainers regarding Translations (was: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do) Marc Haber
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Dirk Lehmann
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Marc Haber
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Bill Allombert
  • Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do Marc Haber
• Bug#1100095: ITP: golang-github-tredoe-osutil -- access to operating system functionality Thomas Goirand
• Bug#1100090: ITP: didder -- An extensive, fast, and accurate command-line image dithering tool. Nicolas Peugnet
• Re: New appointment for the Debian Technical Committee: Paul Tagliamonte <paultag> Sean Whitton
  • Re: New appointment for the Debian Technical Committee: Paul Tagliamonte <paultag> Andreas Tille
• NEW review & revision process (or lack thereof) (Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)) Luke Faraone
  • Re: NEW review & revision process (or lack thereof) (Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: NEW review & revision process (or lack thereof) (Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)) Philip Hands
  • Re: NEW review & revision process (or lack thereof) (Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)) Jonathan Dowland
• Bug#1099948: ITP: doxysphinx -- A lightweight Doxygen extension for Sphinx Christian Bayle
• Re: Need advice on coordinating libkdumpfile update and introducing pykdumpfile Breno Leitao
  • Re: Need advice on coordinating libkdumpfile update and introducing pykdumpfile Michel Lind
  • Re: Need advice on coordinating libkdumpfile update and introducing pykdumpfile Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Need advice on coordinating libkdumpfile update and introducing pykdumpfile Michel Lind
  • Re: Need advice on coordinating libkdumpfile update and introducing pykdumpfile Breno Leitao
• Bug#1099977: ITP: python3-hostlist -- A Python library and command-line toolset for managing, expanding, and manipulating host lists Gennaro Oliva
• Bug#1099951: ITP: mpire -- A Python package for easy multiprocessing, but faster than multiprocessing Christian Bayle
• Bug#1099939: ITP: sphinx-external-toc -- A sphinx extension that allows the site-map to be defined in a single YAML file Christian Bayle
• Bug#1099895: ITP: qtpyvcp -- Framework for LinuxCNC virtual control panels Steffen Möller
• Debian on /usr (Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995) Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Debian on /usr (Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995) Marco d'Itri
  • Re: Debian on /usr (Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995) Matthias Urlichs
• Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) G. Branden Robinson
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon McVittie
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
• Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Philip Hands
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Maytham Alsudany
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Maytham Alsudany
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
• Bug#1099862: ITP: passim -- A local caching server Mario Limonciello
• Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995 Sean Whitton
• Bug#1099859: ITP: python-local-agent-rs -- Proton VPN local agent for managing connections Josenilson Ferreira da Silva
• Re: The Project Gutenberg license, packages using its books as testdata Soren Stoutner
  • Re: The Project Gutenberg license, packages using its books as testdata Maytham Alsudany
• Bug#1099857: ITP: qtpyvcp -- Framework for LinuxCNC virtual control panels Steffen Moeller
• Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Philip Hands
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Andreas Metzler
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Philip Hands
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters The Wanderer
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Bjørn Mork
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Jonathan McDowell
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters James Lu
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Charles Plessy
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Marc Haber
  • please do not use text/markdown Timo Röhling
  • Re: please do not use text/markdown Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: please do not use text/markdown Timo Röhling
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Timo Röhling
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Blair Noctis
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Mario Limonciello
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Tollef Fog Heen
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Christoph Berg
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Antonio Terceiro
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Andrea Pappacoda
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Carsten Schoenert
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Philipp Kern
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Guillem Jover
  • Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters Guillem Jover
  • BTS not unmangling quoting markers with format=flowed (was: Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters) Guillem Jover
• Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Timo Röhling
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Faidon Liambotis
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Wookey
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Timo Röhling
• Bug#1099848: ITP: greaseweazle -- Host tools for Greaseweazle Stephen Kitt
• Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Aurélien COUDERC
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Ansgar 🙀
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Ansgar 🙀
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Marc Haber
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Richter
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Richter
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Marc Haber
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Michael Stone
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Geert Stappers
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Bjørn Mork
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Ansgar 🙀
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Marc Haber
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Marc Haber
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Marc Haber
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Aurélien COUDERC
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Jonathan McDowell
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Philip Hands
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Salsa pipeline limit Peter B
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Steve McIntyre
  • Building live images without non-free-firmware (Was: Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion) Roland Clobus
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Ansgar 🙀
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Michael Stone
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin

• Later messages