On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:06:22PM +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > On Thu, 2001-09-13 at 18:26, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > Em Fri, 14 Sep 2001 00:11:06 +1000 > > Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > > > > I agree. This argument sounds reasonable. If spanish maps to Spain, then > > > english should map to England. > > nah.... that's not it... if I understand it correctly, "united states" > > would map to es_US and "england" would map to en_EN(UK?)... > > my english is really that poor?
I don't think so. I understood perfectly what you meant. > english is _also_ how the americans call their language, but > i think it was called english even before Colombo, right? It's en_UK, btw. And the locale code for pre-Columbus English is enm_UK (assuming that the locale system uses 3 character codes where a 2 character one is not available), not en_UK. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org "I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg