debian-devel  

Messages by Thread

• Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion pandya
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Leandro Cunha
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Mario Limonciello
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Bill Allombert
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Aurélien COUDERC
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Ansgar 🙀
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Ansgar 🙀
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Marc Haber
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Richter
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Richter
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Marc Haber
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Michael Stone
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Geert Stappers
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Bjørn Mork
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Ansgar 🙀
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Marc Haber
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Marc Haber
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Marc Haber
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Aurélien COUDERC
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Jonathan McDowell
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Philip Hands
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Salsa pipeline limit Peter B
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Steve McIntyre
  • Building live images without non-free-firmware (Was: Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion) Roland Clobus
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Ansgar 🙀
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Michael Stone
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Bill Allombert
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion tomas
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Aurélien COUDERC
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Michael Biebl
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Leandro Cunha
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Dirk Lehmann
  • Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion Stephan Verbücheln
• Bug#1099652: ITP: bacon -- background code checker Blair Noctis
• Bug#1099623: ITP: python-pegen -- CPython's PEG parser generator Alexander Sulfrian
• Bug#1099615: ITP: gitlab-buildpkg-tools -- Build a Gitlab-PPA using GitLab CI Christian Bayle
• useful subjects in replies to Bits mails (was Re: Bits from DPL) Jonathan Dowland
• Bug#1099603: ITP: python-atom -- Memory efficient Python objects Alexander Sulfrian
• Bug#1099600: ITP: play.it-strategy -- ./play.it game scripts collection - Strategy games Antoine Le Gonidec
• Bug#1099584: ITP: rocm-docs-core -- ROCm Documentation Core Utilities Christian Bayle
• Bug#1099566: ITP: fonts-ebgaramond-initials -- EB Garamond Initials fonts Agathe Porte
• Bug#1099538: ITP: rust-axum-server -- hyper server implementation used with axum - Rust source code Blair Noctis
• Improvement of headless server upgrades Helmut K. C. Tessarek
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Fabio Fantoni
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Marc Haber
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Michael Banck
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Bjørn Mork
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Marc Haber
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Helmut K. C. Tessarek
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Bjørn Mork
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Helmut K. C. Tessarek
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Marc Haber
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Marc Haber
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Helmut K. C. Tessarek
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Marc Haber
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Lee Garrett
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Hakan Bayındır
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Richard Lewis
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Marc Haber
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Helmut Grohne
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Helmut K. C. Tessarek
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Holger Levsen
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Fabio Fantoni
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Wookey
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Bjørn Mork
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Helmut K. C. Tessarek
  • Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades Helmut K. C. Tessarek
• Bug#1099540: ITP: python3-simple-websocket -- Simple WebSocket server and client for Python Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana
• TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995 Matthew Vernon
  • Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995 Sean Whitton
  • Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995 Helmut Grohne
  • Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995 Marvin Renich
  • Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995 Helmut Grohne
  • Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995 Sean Whitton
  • Debian on /usr (Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995) Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Debian on /usr (Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995) Marco d'Itri
  • Re: Debian on /usr (Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995) Matthias Urlichs
• Bug#1099510: ITP: hypridle -- Idle daemon for Hyprland Carl Keinath
• Re: Bits from DPL Jecs, Attila
  • Re: Bits from DPL Jecs, Attila
  • Re: Bits from DPL Nilesh Patra
  • Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) G. Branden Robinson
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon McVittie
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • NEW review & revision process (or lack thereof) (Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)) Luke Faraone
  • Re: NEW review & revision process (or lack thereof) (Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: NEW review & revision process (or lack thereof) (Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)) Philip Hands
  • Re: NEW review & revision process (or lack thereof) (Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)) Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Bits from DPL Sean Whitton
  • Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Philip Hands
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Maytham Alsudany
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Maytham Alsudany
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon McVittie
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Bits from DPL Marc Haber
  • STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL) Holger Levsen
  • Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL) Marc Haber
  • Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL) Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL) Soren Stoutner
  • Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL) Pirate Praveen
  • Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL) Holger Levsen
  • Re: Bits from DPL Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Bits from DPL Pierre-Elliott Bécue
  • Re: Bits from DPL Leandro Cunha
  • Re: Bits from DPL Matthias Urlichs
  • Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Timo Röhling
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Timo Röhling
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Faidon Liambotis
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Wookey
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Timo Röhling
• Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions Sarbjit Singh Sandhu
  • Re: Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions Henrik Ahlgren
  • Re: Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions Gard Spreemann
  • Re: Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions Sarbjit Singh Sandhu
  • Re: Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions Hakan Bayındır
  • Re: Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions Sarbjit Singh Sandhu
  • Re: Proposal for a Yearly Stable Release Cycle for Educational Institutions Andrey Rakhmatullin
• Bug#1099479: ITP: hyprlock -- Screen locking utility for Hyprland Carl Keinath
• Bug#1099423: RFP: plutosvg -- Tiny SVG rendering library in C Simon McVittie
• Bug#1099422: RFP: plutovg -- Tiny 2D vector graphics library in C Simon McVittie

• Earlier messages
• Later messages