On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:29:02AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I am happy to take it.  But a question: with the more actively
> > maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload
> > and dput?
> 
> IMHO two tools with the same functionality are
>   1. confusing for users
>   2. waste of time for developers. They should spend their time
>      to make one better tool instead of two good tools.

The implementation language really does make a difference in the case of
dupload and dput, since it affects their configuration languages.

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to