On Tue, 03 Sep 2002, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What is the thinking behind always requiring libfoo-dev to depend on > > libbar-dev when libfoo depends on libbar? I understand the need when
The lack of symbol versioning, about 90% of the time. > > but if libfoo opaquely wraps libbar, why have libfoo-dev depend on > > libbar-dev? It only opaquely wraps libbar if it is compiled statically. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh
