On Fri, 23 May 2003 01:06, Mathieu Roy wrote: > > > If the US economy stays down long enough then the current government > > > won't last. Rhetoric about imaginary enemies in Iraq doesn't satisfy > > > people who lose their jobs because of the economy sucking. > > > > Hm, as could be seen in Iraq, boycotts only strenghen the position of > > the rogue leaders ("See? They are all against us! We need to protect > > ourselves! You need a strong man to protect you!" Etc.) > > Both points of view make sense. > > Fact is selecting a location for an event which is outside USA seems a > good compromise for everybody. > People that do not want to go to USA are not forced to, others that do > not think USA should be avoided would surely agree to go elsewhere too.
I have no objections to a conference in the US. If there are enough people interested in attending to make it a good conference then it should be run. The US has a large population, they should be able to justify a conference without any visitors from other countries. I can't rule out the possibility of attending myself. I was merely pointing out one of the reasons why many people are avoiding the US. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page