On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 08:20:08AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > what's wrong with a low-priority debconf question with a sane default?
As long as the sane default is the safe default, which is not to be setgid. -- - mdz
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 08:20:08AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > what's wrong with a low-priority debconf question with a sane default?
As long as the sane default is the safe default, which is not to be setgid. -- - mdz