On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:43:30AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > > For now I'm using the SA-Exim method because even though it's clumsy (needs > > the .so file compiled from source so distribution isn't as trivial as an > > apt-get invocation), I used it before the Exiscan patch was available and it > > was reliable. (I'd welcome suggestions from other users about this issue.) > > Same here though I am sticking with SA-Exim because it saves the mail > in a certain range so I can throw it at the Bayesian classifier.
I usually don't have large enough partitions to hold all the spam (!) > It also has the option of teergrubing. I'm a bit scared of turning it on, didn't (see|read) enough documentation for it. > It's generally accepted that for robust handling of Spam SA-Exim is the > better route. For simple handling as well as virus scanning Exiscan-ACL > is the better route. Lots of people just use both. Isn't that pretty wasteful? -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.