debian-devel  

Messages by Date

• 2025/01/25 Re: Bug#1094175: ITP: linux-os-updater -- Linux OS Updater. This is a package updating system designed to ease the update process for most Linux distributions efficiently. Andrey Rakhmatullin
• 2025/01/25 Re: Bug#1094175: ITP: linux-os-updater -- Linux OS Updater. This is a package updating system designed to ease the update process for most Linux distributions efficiently. Richard Lewis
• 2025/01/25 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Jonathan Dowland
• 2025/01/25 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Rene Engelhard
• 2025/01/25 Bug#1094175: ITP: linux-os-updater -- Linux OS Updater. This is a package updating system designed to ease the update process for most Linux distributions efficiently. Crypticverse
• 2025/01/25 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Philipp Kern
• 2025/01/25 Bug#1094172: ITP: python-minijinja -- Experimental Python binding of the Rust MiniJinja template engine Carsten Schoenert
• 2025/01/25 Bug#1094168: ITP: showtime -- Watch without distraction Danial Behzadi
• 2025/01/25 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• 2025/01/25 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Colin Watson
• 2025/01/25 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Phil Morrell
• 2025/01/25 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Xiyue Deng
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Xiyue Deng
• 2025/01/24 SEVERE PROBLEM : dpkg --force-unsafe-io being ignored, +SSD Officina DTA
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Christoph J. Scherr
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Gioele Barabucci
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Fabio Fantoni
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Fabio Fantoni
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Soren Stoutner
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Gioele Barabucci
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? thomas
• 2025/01/24 Bug#1094016: ITP: golang-k8s-kms -- Kubernetes KMS implementation Arthur Diniz
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Xiyue Deng
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Xiyue Deng
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Fabio Fantoni
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Sean Whitton
• 2025/01/24 Bug#1094025: ITP: cxxbridge-cmd -- C++ code generator for integrating `cxx` Matthias Geiger
• 2025/01/24 Bug#1094022: ITP: jj -- A Git-compatible VCS that is both simple and powerful Sylvestre Ledru
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Jonas Smedegaard
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Otto Kekäläinen
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Otto Kekäläinen
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Otto Kekäläinen
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Jonas Smedegaard
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Raphael Hertzog
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Sam Hartman
• 2025/01/24 Bug#1094011: ITP: haskell-language-server -- The official Haskell language server (LSP) implementation Pete Ryland
• 2025/01/24 Re: Is it possible to customise the d-i just to add an ssh authorized key for root Philip Hands
• 2025/01/24 Re: Is it possible to customise the d-i just to add an ssh authorized key for root Philip Hands
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Christoph J. Scherr
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Fabio Fantoni
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Yadd
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Jeremy Stanley
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Tobias Frost
• 2025/01/24 Re: Is it possible to customise the d-i just to add an ssh authorized key for root Emanuele Rocca
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Gioele Barabucci
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Andrej Shadura
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Jonas Smedegaard
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Colin Watson
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Jeremy Bícha
• 2025/01/24 +1 (Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian) Holger Levsen
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Colin Watson
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Andrea Pappacoda
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Antonio Terceiro
• 2025/01/24 Re: Is it possible to customise the d-i just to add an ssh authorized key for root Colin Watson
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Jonas Smedegaard
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Fabio Fantoni
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Christoph J. Scherr
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Jonas Smedegaard
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Jonas Smedegaard
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Philip Hands
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Salvo Tomaselli
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Jonathan Dowland
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Gard Spreemann
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Gard Spreemann
• 2025/01/24 Is it possible to customise the d-i just to add an ssh authorized key for root PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Gioele Barabucci
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Gioele Barabucci
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Yadd
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Gard Spreemann
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Gioele Barabucci
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• 2025/01/24 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• 2025/01/24 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• 2025/01/23 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Samuel Thibault
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Xiyue Deng
• 2025/01/23 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Michael Tokarev
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Sam Hartman
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Wookey
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Sam Hartman
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Otto Kekäläinen
• 2025/01/23 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Sam Hartman
• 2025/01/23 Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Marco d'Itri
• 2025/01/23 DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections? Otto Kekäläinen
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Wookey
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Wookey
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Chris Hofstaedtler
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Otto Kekäläinen
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Otto Kekäläinen
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Otto Kekäläinen
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Sam Hartman
• 2025/01/23 Bug#1093901: ITP: golang-github-google-go-tdx-guest -- wrap /dev/tdx-guest and attestation verification Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/23 Bug#1093892: RFH: corectrl -- Control your computer hardware using application profiles Matthias Geiger
• 2025/01/23 Bug#1093887: ITP: nmo -- datalog-based rule engine nemo Jonas Smedegaard
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/23 Bug#1093875: ITP: lomiri-dekko-app -- Convergent email client for Lomiri Mike Gabriel
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Colin Watson
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Jonas Smedegaard
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Jonas Smedegaard
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Gioele Barabucci
• 2025/01/23 +1 (Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian) Holger Levsen
• 2025/01/23 Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian Matthew Vernon
• 2025/01/23 PCRE2 10.45~rc1-1 uploaded to experimental Matthew Vernon
• 2025/01/23 Bug#1093838: ITP: golang-github-google-go-tpm-tools -- high-level library API for using TPMs Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/23 Bug#1093835: ITP: golang-github-google-go-configfs-tsm -- Trusted Security Module attestation reporting (library) Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/23 Bug#1093833: ITP: golang-github-google-go-sev-guest -- attestation verification reporting via /dev/sev-guest Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/23 Bug#1093832: ITP: golang-github-google-logger -- Cross platform Go logging library. Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/22 Bug#1093811: ITP: libgedit-gfls -- File loading and saving library for gedit Jeremy Bícha
• 2025/01/22 Re: Bug#1091394: nproc: add new option to reduce emitted processors by system memory Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• 2025/01/22 Re: Bug#1091394: nproc: add new option to reduce emitted processors by system memory Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• 2025/01/22 Bug#1093767: ITP: sass-grass -- Sass compiler written purely in Rust Jonas Smedegaard
• 2025/01/22 Bug#1093759: ITP: ayatana-greeter-badges -- Session badges for some LightDM-based greeters Mike Gabriel
• 2025/01/21 Re: What is going on with atomics? Simon Richter
• 2025/01/21 Re: What is going on with atomics? Matthias Klose
• 2025/01/21 Bug#1093739: ITP: golang-github-lifenjoiner-dhcpdns -- dhcpdns is a golang package to get the DHCP DNS. Eric Dorland
• 2025/01/21 Bug#1093737: ITP: android-cuttlefish -- Cuttlefish Android Virtual Device companion package PaulLiu
• 2025/01/21 Re: What is going on with atomics? John Scott
• 2025/01/21 Re: What is going on with atomics? Colin Watson
• 2025/01/21 Re: What is going on with atomics? Theodore Ts'o
• 2025/01/21 Re: write the fine manual (was Re: Removing manpages from libpam-modules to improve multi-arch) Theodore Ts'o
• 2025/01/21 Re: Is HURD's lack of HOST_NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX a good architectural approach Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/21 Re: Is HURD's lack of HOST_NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX a good architectural approach Samuel Thibault
• 2025/01/21 Re: Is HURD's lack of HOST_NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX a good architectural approach Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• 2025/01/21 Re: Is HURD's lack of HOST_NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX a good architectural approach Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
• 2025/01/21 Re: sbuild wiki page - cross compiling section query Phil Wyett
• 2025/01/20 Re: Is HURD's lack of HOST_NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX a good architectural approach Guillem Jover
• 2025/01/20 Re: Is HURD's lack of HOST_NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX a good architectural approach Samuel Thibault
• 2025/01/20 Re: Is HURD's lack of HOST_NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX a good architectural approach Sam Hartman
• 2025/01/20 Bug#1093660: ITP: ocaml-markup -- error-recovering functional HTML5 and XML parsers and writers Stéphane Glondu
• 2025/01/20 Re: Is HURD's lack of HOST_NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX a good architectural approach Samuel Thibault
• 2025/01/20 Re: Is HURD's lack of HOST_NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX a good architectural approach Sam Hartman
• 2025/01/20 Please Test Pam 1.7.0 from experimental Sam Hartman
• 2025/01/20 Re: Is HURD's lack of HOST_NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX a good architectural approach Samuel Thibault
• 2025/01/20 Is HURD's lack of HOST_NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX a good architectural approach Sam Hartman
• 2025/01/20 Re: Fwd: warzone2100_4.5.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Soren Stoutner
• 2025/01/20 Re: sbuild wiki page - cross compiling section query Jochen Sprickerhof
• 2025/01/20 Re: sbuild wiki page - cross compiling section query Phil Wyett
• 2025/01/20 Re: sbuild wiki page - cross compiling section query Jochen Sprickerhof
• 2025/01/20 Re: sbuild wiki page - cross compiling section query Andrey Rakhmatullin
• 2025/01/20 Re: sbuild wiki page - cross compiling section query Andrey Rakhmatullin
• 2025/01/20 Re: sbuild wiki page - cross compiling section query Phil Wyett
• 2025/01/20 Re: sbuild wiki page - cross compiling section query Phil Wyett
• 2025/01/20 DEP-14 branches explained visually Otto Kekäläinen
• 2025/01/20 Re: sbuild wiki page - cross compiling section query Andrey Rakhmatullin
• 2025/01/20 Re: sbuild wiki page - cross compiling section query Jochen Sprickerhof
• 2025/01/20 sbuild wiki page - cross compiling section query Phil Wyett
• 2025/01/20 Re: Removing manpages from libpam-modules to improve multi-arch Jonas Smedegaard
• 2025/01/19 Bug#1093576: ITP: golang-github-opencoff-go-sieve -- SIEVE cache - simpler than LRU Eric Dorland
• 2025/01/19 Re: Fwd: warzone2100_4.5.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Fabian Grünbichler
• 2025/01/19 Re: Fwd: warzone2100_4.5.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Andrey Rakhmatullin
• 2025/01/19 Fwd: warzone2100_4.5.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Russell Coker
• 2025/01/19 What's next for the Debian Wiki? (was Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine) Jonathan Dowland
• 2025/01/19 Re: Mentors. Confirmed packages needing DD review and possible sponsorship Phil Wyett
• 2025/01/18 Re: Bug#1093427: ITP: td1.8.11 -- telegram database library (development headers, API/ABI v1.8.11) Mike Gabriel
• 2025/01/18 Bug#1093427: ITP: td1.8.11 -- telegram database library (development headers, API/ABI v1.8.11) Mike Gabriel
• 2025/01/18 Re: Mentors. Confirmed packages needing DD review and possible sponsorship Phil Wyett
• 2025/01/18 Bug#1093417: (no subject) MuntasirSZN
• 2025/01/18 Re: Mentors. Confirmed packages needing DD review and possible sponsorship Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/18 Mentors. Confirmed packages needing DD review and possible sponsorship Phil Wyett
• 2025/01/17 Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Andreas Metzler
• 2025/01/17 Bug#1093373: marked as done (general: lots of dependencies missing fro upgrade on trixie) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2025/01/17 Re: Bug#1093373: general: lots of dependencies missing fro upgrade on trixie Soren Stoutner
• 2025/01/17 Bug#1093379: ITP: golang-github-santhosh-tekuri-jsonschema -- JSONSchema Validation using Go Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/17 Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Frank Guthausen
• 2025/01/17 Bug#1093373: general: lots of dependencies missing fro upgrade on trixie Cristobal Lanzagorta
• 2025/01/17 Bug#1093319: ITP: golang-github-go-http-utils-headers -- HTTP header constants for Gophers (Go library) Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/17 Bug#1093317: ITP: golang-github-saracen-fastzip -- opinionated Zip archiver with a focus on speed (Go library) Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/17 Bug#1093316: ITP: golang-github-saracen-zipextra -- utils for ZIP archive format's "Extra Fields" (Go library) Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/17 Bug#1093313: ITP: golang-gitlab-gitlab-org-fleeting-fleeting -- abstraction for cloud providers' instance groups for GitLab Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/17 Bug#1093309: ITP: golang-github-sourcegraph-conc -- Better structured concurrency for go Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/17 Re: What is going on with atomics? Simon McVittie
• 2025/01/17 Bug#1093302: ITP: mage -- a Make/rake-like dev tool using Go Simon Josefsson
• 2025/01/17 Re: What is going on with atomics? Wookey

• Later messages