On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:51:24AM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> And keeping IA64 in the loop is just another joke from the release > >> team. It'd be interesting to find out, but I bet more m68ks were sold > >> than IA64 last year. > > > > Which of these two architectures are you more likely to be able to run a > > current 2.6 kernel on, BTW? > > I fail to see why this matters at all. It's not in your list of > requirements, remember ? > > > You do know that m68k is the only architecture still carrying around > > 2.*2* kernels in sarge? > > Yes. But there are 2.4 kernels available too, don't forget to mention > that fact. No 2.6, though, but that's not a problem right now. Might > become a problem for etch, I agree.
There is 2.6 work on m68k, just not all subarches are ready for it though. > m68k folks, is there anything in the works for 2.6 ? Yep, runs since a couple of month last time i was informed for that, at least on the amiga arch. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]