On Jun 14, Humberto Massa Guimarăes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Humberto Massa Guimarăes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Obviously, I'm assuming that we are redistributing Firefox under > > > the terms of the GPL because IIRC the MPL is not DFSG-free. > > > > This is, uh, debated. > Is it? I seemed to recall that the MPL contained a choice-of-venue > clause, and that -legal deemed choice-of-venue as non-free, because > imposes a burden on the licensee in case of litigation. There is no agreement that choice-of-venue clauses are non-free.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
