On 11/29/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/29/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > > And nearly four months later, the package has 92 bugs, 16 with patch > > > and a lot even without a single response. > > > > This is not true. > > What part isn't? > > > Stop bothering me. > > Why? > > > Most of the patches are not valid. > > Shouldn't the patch tag be removed and an explanation given then? > > > Please work on the bugs which are tagged as help needed. > > Why would I do that while I'm waiting for the status of the patch I > already wrote?
Bernd?
