On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:56:37PM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061019 21:31]: > > Andreas Barth a écrit : > > >A violation of the parts of the debian policy as listed on > > >http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt is serious level (that > > >should be the same as the must-directives in policy, but - well, I hope > > >that I have finally time post-etch to sync that finally). > > > > > >Any other policy violation is at most important level (unless it > > >conincides with one of the other criteria for RC bugs, of course). > > > > > > > Note that what we are discussing (must have in targets debian/rules) are > > listed on http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt > > As vorlon said, that is listed under the heading of "4. Autobuilding", > so the scope is "buildds must not fail" of this rule. That is why I
Where does it say the scope for 4. Autobuilding is "buildds must not fail" ? It does say "Packages must autobuild without failure on all architectures on which they are supported", but that's one of the options that make a bug RC. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]