2007/9/26, Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Don Armstrong wrote: > > The reason why maintainers may be checked far more thoroughly is > > because the average employee of Google or Microsoft can't make changes > > to any piece of software company wide, nor do they vote on the > > direction of the entire company. [It's also far easier to fire someone > > than it is to remove a Developer.] > > Nor can they write emails with the branding of Debian as a project (and > eventually throw a bad light on it), nor can they use (and possibly > abuse) the infrastructure a dozen volunteers provide.
Why just new maintainers are checked so precisely? The old Debian developers also can make a threat for Debian Project. It's logical, that everybody should be checked, especially the old developers which didn't be check so paranoid in the past. I hope you see the absurdity in this procedure... -- .''`. Piotr Roszatycki : :' : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
