Neil Williams wrote: > The work of those DD's is constantly reviewed and checked by other DD's > - during mass bug filing, NMU's, bug triage etc.etc.
And the work of non-DD contributors isn't? Come on, you know that I don't speak against how it is currently, but against the /argumentation/. It is as it is: We need to trust in that the people, who ever got DD, are trust worth. If we do not, then a community and the good work like it is can't be kept up. > as new DD's. Staying up to date after acceptance is a trickle process - > it is completely impractical to try to require ongoing examination of > such a process. Full ACK. And *this* is a true argument, IMHO. It is just not realizable to ongoing examine if DD stayed actual with current policies or their interest. > Old or new, if a DD makes a wrong call on a mailing list or in a bug > report, there's usually someone who will point it out. > :-) Right. :-)) -Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
