On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:11:26PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > The primary problem with setting Reply-To is that it makes private > replies extremely difficult (in clients that honor the RFC-defined > meaning of the header field, at least) and significantly increases the > chances that private replies will accidentally become public. I don't > think that's the right social direction in which to go.
If this is such a concern, I would like to see the Code of Conduct updates to recommend that people concerned with follow up emails set the appropriate headers in their own clients. This was detailed earlier in this thread. -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
