On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 02:56:20PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > In particular, from the replies to my question the picture I get is > that everybody is using ad hoc solutions to implement what some people > are pretending to be properly supported by Debian. I found it not > defendable, maybe it's just me, maybe it's just bad marketing. > > Of the two one: > > - We decide that mounting /usr remotely is a Debian goal. > > If we do so, the mechanisms to make it work should not be as ad hoc > as this thread as hinted. We should provide a package explicitly > made to make this workflow tenable and point our users to it. > > - We decide that if you want to mount /usr remotely you are on your > own. > > If we do so, we should stop using "mount /usr remotely" as an > argument for keeping /usr as a single filesystem.
What about the (many) arguments made here about the *other* reasons to have /usr a separate filesystem? regards, iustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
