On 19/01/10 at 14:36 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Neil McGovern <ne...@debian.org> writes: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > >> This is a bug in the netatalk Debian packaging. You cannot assume the > >> package will be built in a clean chroot; among other things, the buildd > >> software explicitly does not guarantee that all packages will be > >> removed. > > > Would it be time to start looking at LVM snapshops + sbuild perhaps? > > Well, I would argue that proper package builds in dirty environments is > something we want in Debian anyway, and while this isn't the ideal method > to find it, it would be a bug regardless of how the buildds worked.
Why would we want that? I mean, it's very difficult to guarantee that packages build correctly in dirty envs. I don't really see the point of enforcing that when we have the technology (pbuilder, sbuild + lvm snapshots) there to ignore that problem. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org