On 20/01/10 at 01:49 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > There are two ways to attack that problem: > > how about the compromise and doing both, except that for (1) we file the bugs > with severity important?
There are a lot of more useful QA tasks that are waiting for someone with more time. (like, I think, piuparts, which could always benefit from more manpower, even if you recent work has been great) Why spend a lot of time on tasks that provide little benefit, and also some disadvantages (in some cases, the fixes might be non-obvious, and requires changes to the packaging that tend to obscure it, for example by using --disable-foo for each and every option we don't want)? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org