Russ Allbery wrote: > Yes. I explicitly declined to add a Lintian tag warning about all use of > format 1.0 because I don't believe there's consensus to deprecate it. But > the request to note the format explicitly seemed reasonable to me.
I disagree - my packages are in source format 1, I should *not* have to do *anything* to them to say that and if Lintian warns me about them being in sf1 and not saying so then that is a bug in Lintian. It should *never* be a requirement of an existing system that it be changed to state that it is such just because a newer system exists. Colin -- Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1223 293413 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id Debian Developer | +44(0)7799 143369 | 0x1B3045CE -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4babbb24.7020...@debian.org
